W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > February 2010

RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:05:59 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F01E16795@email2>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Werner.

Thanks for your good comments J

 

I added inline comments as below.

 

From: Bailer, Werner [mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:25 PM
To: 이원석
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting

 

Dear Wonsuk, all,

 

Thanks for the new draft, I think it is a major improvement. 

 

However, I have a few comments:

 

- in the abstract it says we define “semantics-preserving”: the introduction states correctly that this cannot always be achieved – so it should be removed from the abstract

à how about “syntactic and semantic level mappings” instead of “semantics-preserving mappings” ?

 

- section 3.1: shouldn’t we list for completeness also string, float and integer and refer to definitions we are using

à Agreed

 

- section 3.2: we are currently not using any complex type definitions in the table, esp. not the person example given

à I would like to remove this part.

 

- the editorial note in 4.1.2 should reference annex A

à Agreed

 

- ma:location: I’m not an expert in this, but afaik there are different coordinate systems for geolocation, so we should add a string for the coordinate system to the log/lat/alt triple

à I am not sure at this moment, but I added geoLocation:String to Data type column of ma:location row. Is it right?

 

- 4.2.1.1 ma:right should be ma:copyright

à Agreed.

 

- Annex A: I think discovery of tracks can be dropped, this is resolved by the redefinition of ma:fragment

à Agreed. Could you propose the draft of redefinition ? It would be great J

 

- Annex A: I think including the references we have in the Wiki for each of the issues could be useful

à Agreed.

 

 

- Annex C: I’ve asked that before: are really all references normative? E.g. MPEG-21 that we consider not in scope

à Agreed.

 

- typo: “vocbulary” in the introduction

- typo: cunjuntion -> conjunction in 3.2

à Agreed.

 

Best regards,

Wonsuk

 

Best regards,

Werner

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 09:36
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting

 

below is the updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting.

Please review and if you have any comment, let me know.

 

http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html


 

best regards,

Wonsuk.

 

Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 06:06:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 26 February 2010 06:06:39 GMT