- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:40:39 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- CC: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Raphaël, Let me explain our one can conclude on the 3 questions: You take the som of the ranking of 3 questions: the lowest som wins: Media RSS 2+1+3= 6 EXIF 1+5+1= 7 Youtube 4+2+4= 10 TV-Anytime 5+7+3=15 ID3 frames 5+4+7=16 MPEG-7 =8+6+2= 16 EBUCore 7+3+8= 19 I hope this clarifies the calculation. Thierry. Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear all, > >>> Regarding to the result of third question, ID3 frames should be >>> replaced with MPEG-7. >> >> Not sure how you conclude to this. >> >> If you add the ranking (lowest number should win) >> >> MPEG-7= 8+6+2 =16 >> ID3= 5+4+7 =16-7 >> >> MPEG-7 and ID3 are equal ;-) > > You can also perfectly conclude that the 3rd question contradicts the > first 2 questions due to their ambiguity, see the related concern from > David Singer. Hence, MPEG-7 is the 8th preferred format to work on (1st > question) but it is preferred by 10 persons, rank 2 in the 3rd question > !!! My conclusion is that this questionnaire is ambiguous and the > answers contradict themselves! > If the complexity is one of the criteria to keep at least one format > (complex) then MPEG-7 should be in ... > Best regards. > > Raphaël >
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 11:41:03 UTC