Re: Suggestion to provide a wiktionary-like version of the media ontology

Hi all,

I agree that such a version is a good idea. In practice I think it would be
good to generate something like that from a master version automatically, to
avoid double effort.

Felix

2009/4/20 Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>

> Hi Ruben!
>
> I think this would be a good idea. As far as i know, Dave wanted to
> rephrase the Top Supported Attributes (as Raphaël suggested) into a more
> detailed version. Perhaps you should talk to him in order to coordinate that
> there are no duplicate efforts.
>
> My personal opinion is, that we should make a browsable version for the
> wiki, because in the terms of overview and clarity. I think a detailed
> overview of the defined attributes should be a part of a document.
>
> Best regards,
> Florian
>
> Am 20.04.2009 um 19:09 schrieb Rubén Tous:
>
>
>  Dear all,
>>
>> I've been thinking that it could be good to have a browsable version of
>> our ontology (emulating the wiktionary/wikipedia style). Sorry if the group
>> already considered this possibility in the past. The good thing is that we
>> already use MediaWiki :-), I've created an example entry at
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MediaOntology. What do
>> you think?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Ruben
>>
>
>