W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Suggestion to provide a wiktionary-like version of the media ontology

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:16:57 +0200
Message-ID: <ba4134970904202116mba5df6fh37760095b33c464a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Cc: Rubén Tous <rtous@ac.upc.edu>, Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi all,

I agree that such a version is a good idea. In practice I think it would be
good to generate something like that from a master version automatically, to
avoid double effort.


2009/4/20 Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>

> Hi Ruben!
> I think this would be a good idea. As far as i know, Dave wanted to
> rephrase the Top Supported Attributes (as Raphaël suggested) into a more
> detailed version. Perhaps you should talk to him in order to coordinate that
> there are no duplicate efforts.
> My personal opinion is, that we should make a browsable version for the
> wiki, because in the terms of overview and clarity. I think a detailed
> overview of the defined attributes should be a part of a document.
> Best regards,
> Florian
> Am 20.04.2009 um 19:09 schrieb Rubén Tous:
>  Dear all,
>> I've been thinking that it could be good to have a browsable version of
>> our ontology (emulating the wiktionary/wikipedia style). Sorry if the group
>> already considered this possibility in the past. The good thing is that we
>> already use MediaWiki :-), I've created an example entry at
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MediaOntology. What do
>> you think?
>> Best regards,
>> Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 04:17:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:33 UTC