W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Some thoughts on use cases

From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:08:13 +0200
Message-ID: <48D8C00D.8090607@cwi.nl>
To: Véronique Malaisé <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
CC: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org

Dear all,

> I agree that it is too broad as it is, but there are two core points:
> - one is related to the description schema and search possibilities 
> ([6083]), namely: should the description scheme define a set of 
> properties to make explicit relationships between the metadata elements 
> describing one content (who, between the possible participants is 
> performing one of the multiple actions possibly attached to the 
> description of one document), to allow a precise description of the 
> content (and not enforce it).

The Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) portal seems to be a relevant 
pointer for this use case, http://vraweb.org/ccoweb/cco/index.html.
It contains a list of vocabularies and thesauri together with metadata 
schemas for describing cultural heritage objects. I'm not sure however 
that the current format allows to represent complex relationships in 
your annotations as you would like to put in the requirement [6083].

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 10:09:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 05:33:19 GMT