W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Some thoughts on use cases

From: Véronique Malaisé <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <48D8D193.5010202@few.vu.nl>
To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
CC: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org

Raphaël Troncy wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>> I agree that it is too broad as it is, but there are two core points:
>> - one is related to the description schema and search possibilities 
>> ([6083]), namely: should the description scheme define a set of 
>> properties to make explicit relationships between the metadata 
>> elements describing one content (who, between the possible 
>> participants is performing one of the multiple actions possibly 
>> attached to the description of one document), to allow a precise 
>> description of the content (and not enforce it).
>
>
> The Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) portal seems to be a relevant 
> pointer for this use case, http://vraweb.org/ccoweb/cco/index.html.
> It contains a list of vocabularies and thesauri together with metadata 
> schemas for describing cultural heritage objects. I'm not sure however 
> that the current format allows to represent complex relationships in 
> your annotations as you would like to put in the requirement [6083].

The annotation format that has been adopted in the MultimediaN e-culture 
project is probably also relevant, as it is generic enough to be applied 
to Multimedia documents.
Demo of their search interface in Ch collections at: 
http://e-culture.multimedian.nl/demo/search

Veronique

>
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 10:21:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 05:33:19 GMT