Re: [new use case suggestion] Use Case - Digital imaging lifecycle

Rapha$(D+3(Bl Troncy $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B:
>
> Dear all,
>
>> as you said below, in some formats like EXIF there is no separation
between "historic" and metadata of the resource, and in others there
is. Again I think we need to decide: how many details do we want to
take into account? I think for metadata interoperability, the
EXIF+others approach from the metadata WG is sufficient. What do you
think?
>
> At this stage, I think it is not wise to take a final decision of what
goes in the media ontology (and what does not).

I agree.


> A very good approach is however to document all the possible
alternatives (i.e. precisely describe for each formats/standards what
they can do). It will be useful at the end for justifying the rationale
behind the ontology modeling and scope.

+1 as well.

>
> Ruben, Victor (the UPC gang), do you have write access to the wiki?

Ruben at least should have write access, since he is Working Group
participant.

Felix

> What about adding there the use cases you have sent to the list and
completing the existing ones?
> Best regards.
>
>   Rapha$(D+3(Bl
>