W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mathonwebpages@w3.org > August 2018

Re: MathOnWeb CG -- meeting minutes 2018-08-30

From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:39:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAESRWkA=x1a3CM2LLVqQzgCrO1OfNErOm5PY90c6tJiA-KHgYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
Cc: mathonweb <public-mathonwebpages@w3.org>
* Peter: as per actio, I created the wiki page discussed on Monday for a11y
TF

I filled in the wiki page
<https://github.com/w3c/mathonwebpages/wiki/[a11y-TF]-ambiguous-notation>with
examples and some text and a few more forms. Unfortunately, the math isn't
aligned well with the text, but it is the best I could do with the wiki.

    Neil


On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are the minutes from the meeting on August 30.
>
> In the meeting, we decided to reduce the main meeting to a monthly one. So
> the next meeting of the full CG will be Sept 27 (but TFs continue to meet
> bi-weekly).
>
> Best,
> Peter.
>
> # MathOnWeb CG 2018-08-30
>
> * Present: Peter, Neil, Dani, Kevin
>   * regrets: Joanie, Volker, Charles
> * Peter: as per actio, I created the wiki page discussed on Monday for
> a11y TF
>   * I also created one for CSS TF as per the last meeting
>     * prepping for tpac should be priority for the next few weeks
>   * Neil: who's going?
>     * Peter:  https://github.com/w3c/mathonwebpages/wiki/MathOnWeb-
> CG-@-TPAC-2018
> * Dani: now that TFs meet, can we reduce the Thursday meetings?
>   * once a month? less?
>   * Neil: having a meeting would be good, e.g., I can't make the CSS TF
> meetings
>   * => AGREED: 1 main meeting per month is enough right now
> * Neil: does anyone know more about MathML related funding?
>   * Sloan giving to NISO https://www.niso.org/niso-io/
> newsline/2018/08/newsline-august-2018?
>   * => interesting news, not much info to be found, nobody had heard more
> * Dani: on a11y. say we want to label something as fraction
>   * with a dictionary, we have to make it open
>   * but another question is navigating through an expression
>   * we seem to mixing these and get confused over it
>   * e.g. an role for fraction is a feature
>   * but is not sufficient for what we want to do
>     * e.g. aria-label overwrites entire accessible name
>     * e.g. on the other hand aria-owns describes structure differntly
>   * when talking to ARIA/APA we should separate those clearly
>   * Peter: yes, I think some of Monday's meeting was already going in this
> direction
>   * Neil: right, extracting the semantics even falls into two parts:
> inference and speech/etc generation, then there's navigation
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 17:39:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 31 August 2018 17:39:36 UTC