Re: Prototype Silver SC

Jeanne,
the link for the prototype for UA and AT (assistive tech? or authoring
tool?) would be useful.
Sounds like Element Level is the choice. I will dig around and see what
resources we have on that SC.

Jim

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM Jeanne Spellman <
jspellman@paciellogroup.com> wrote:

> I think Element Level Customization would be a challenging choice
> (therefore a good choice) for Silver feasibility testing. I would also
> like an example that could be used for Silver feasibility testing of
> measurement of success-criteria-equivalents.  I think Jim mentioned Font
> Families as an example of an SC that is difficult to True/False
> statement test.  I think this would also be helpful.
>
> Could you ask someone to write up the description of the SCs (maybe
> whatever you drafted for the Understanding document would do as is) so
> we can start including the text in the prototypes?  This is NOT a
> content proposal, this is sample text that we can use for evaluating the
> prototypes.  We aren't working on content yet. Content will be starting
> in Q4 2018 at the earliest.
>
> This just my opinion, because the Silver group only discussed including
> user agents at the Design Sprint, and hasn't developed any ideas in
> detail since then.  I would like to invite any of you to try out some
> ideas, because I think that LVTF has a high investment in user agent
> accessibility.
>
> I think Silver could approach user agent accessibility like this: For
> each Silver success-criterion-equivalent, there would also be
> implementation advice for user agents, assistive technology, and
> authoring tools (in addition to advice for authors). For user agents,
> the tests could become Web Platform tests (the results are public and
> watched by the browser C-level executives). Web Platform has never had
> accessibility tests, but I know there are people in the browser A11y
> departments that are interested in writing them.
>
> At the Design Sprint, Makoto Ueki spoke passionately of the need to
> include AT advice for international users.  This could help the
> non-English screen readers prioritize and implement features that they
> currently cannot do. I would like Silver to include AT advice and
> Authoring Tool advice as well as User Agent. Wayne Dick talked about the
> need for better AT for low vision.  He discussed how the various low
> vision AT are insufficient for long form reading.  Silver could help.
>
> Table 2 at the Silver Design Sprint did a rough prototype on including
> User Agent and Assistive Technology advice. I can find the link to it if
> you want to see it for inspiration.
>
> Thanks!  This is really a big help to the Silver group.  It is much
> better to involve the people who are expert in the issues early on.
>
> jeanne
>
>
> On 7/18/2018 10:04 AM, Jonathan Avila wrote:
> > +1 to element-level customization as well -- although I admit it could
> be tricky from simply an authoring standpoint.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 9:57 AM
> > To: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
> > Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>;
> Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@paciellogroup.com>
> > Subject: Re: Prototype Silver SC
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > +1 for Element Level Customization.
> >
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Element_Level_Customization
> >
> > Kindest Regards,
> > Laura
> >
> > On 7/17/18, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote:
> >> Last week, the Silver Task Force asked the LVTF for SC that did not
> >> make it in to WCAG21. Several items were mentioned, see below. Which
> >> is our #1 choice
> >>
> >>     - Browser exemptions/issues
> >>        -  1.4.11 [1] -  "... where the appearance of the component is
> >>        determined by the user agent and not modified by the author;"
> >> the exemption
> >>        for contrast of native active elements (form element, focus
> >> ring, media
> >>        controls, etc.) failing WCAG20 3:1 contrast threshold
> >>        - 1.4.13 [2] - "Exception: The visual presentation of the
> additional
> >>        content is controlled by the user agent and is not modified by
> the
> >>        author."  the exemption for 'title' attribute
> >>     - Element Level Customization [3] - user interface for UA to allow
> >>     override of many values. Closely related to Personalization. It is
> the
> >>     super set of the proposed SCs on font size, family, color,
> >>     justification, hyphenation, etc. Also know as Return of User
> Stylesheets
> >>     - Printing [4] - documents printed do not loose content. Huge
> discussion
> >>     - much having to do with testing. Closely related to this is the
> >> user being
> >>     able to print what is on the screen after all of the font, spacing,
> and
> >>     sizing changes have been applied. Would be nice not to have to
> write a
> >>     print style sheet. If I zoom a page a bit to make it easier to
> >> read, I want
> >>     to print at that size.
> >>
> >> ​
> >> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Issues_to_be_addres
> >> sed_in_Silver> 1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#non-text-contrast
> >> 2. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#content-on-hover-or-focus
> >> 3.
> >>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Element_Level_Customization
> >> 4. https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76    [Printing SC]
> >>
> >> LVTF issues for Silver
> >> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Issues_to_be_addres
> >> sed_in_Silver>
> >> --
> >> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
> >> Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> >> 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> >> voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> >> "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Laura L. Carlson
> >
>
> --
>
> Jeanne Spellman
> --
> Senior Accessibility Engineer
> The Paciello Group
> https://www.paciellogroup.com
> A VFO™ Company http://www.vfo-group.com/
>
> Skype: jeanne_spellman
> Twitter, Github @jspellman
> --
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and
> notify us immediately.Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action
> taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on
> this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>


-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964