Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 06/18/2013 08:29 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com
> <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>
>     Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views
>     you continue to espouse in this debate.
>
> I actually believe the opposite. That's why I wish emails had +1 in them.

Indeed, the results of this poll on the meaning of the term Linked Data 
are pretty clear, though I'm sure an extremely vocal minority will swear 
up and down that they are meaningless:
http://goo.gl/GMeom

The original poll was posted here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jun/0163.html

David

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 13:24:54 UTC