Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF from Luca Matteis on 2013-06-18 (public-lod@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:54:38 +0200
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CALp38ENerwnLM-f-eUFxUwTwC4mhbvnbdpBkVnNAY9jXNxjsrw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

> Indeed, the results of this poll on the meaning of the term Linked Data
> are pretty clear, though I'm sure an extremely vocal minority will swear up
> and down that they are meaningless:
> http://goo.gl/GMeom
>
> The original poll was posted here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-lod/2013Jun/**0163.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jun/0163.html>
>

+1

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 13:55:06 UTC