W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2013

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [ANN] Add your links to DBpedia workflow version 0.1 (this is also an RFC)

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:01:17 -0500
Message-ID: <50F82E5D.4080406@openlinksw.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> I also think this quite important.
>
> What I would really like to see is certain conceptual things in 
> dbpedia is typed with skos:Concept. That gives me some assurance and 
> encourages me (and probably others) to use skos:*Match where 
> appropriate instead of slapping owl:sameAs.
>
> For instance, resources that are of type dbo:Country, can we have 
> skos:Concept for these for starters? :)

Make a Turtle doc, or put together a bunch of sparql constructs. Once 
they are provided, they can be applied to the static and live instances. 
The new triples just go in their own named graph, and the rest of the 
matter is down to SPARQL and reasoning etc..

Do it now :-)

Kingsley
>
> -Sarven
>
>
> On 01/17/2013 01:22 PM, Søren Roug wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see that you have also added EUNIS links for species. I can provide
>> you with a much better quality, and I have forked the repo. But I am
>> concerned about the use of owl:sameAs as the predicate. The community
>> doesn't have consensus on the species names and we can't even agree
>> on many species - e.g. is the goat in the Pyrenees the same species
>> as the one in southern Spain or a subspecies? I don't want some
>> OWL-aware query tool to be utterly confused.
>>
>> What I'm asking is: Can I use skos:exactMatch and skos:closeMatch
>> instead of owl:sameAs?
>>
>> -- Sincerely yours / Med venlig hilsen, Søren Roug
>> <soren.roug@eea.europa.eu> European Environment Agency, Kongens
>> Nytorv 6, DK-1050 Copenhagen K Tel: +45 2368 3660 Jabber:
>> roug@jabber.eea.europa.eu This email was delivered using 100%
>> recycled electrons. Please try to keep it that way.
>>
>>
>> || -----Original Message----- || From: Sebastian Hellmann
>> [mailto:hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de] || Sent: 17 January 2013
>> 10:18 || To: Dbpedia-developers; DBpedia discussion; public-lod ||
>> Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [ANN] Add your links to DBpedia
>> workflow || version 0.1 (this is also an RFC) || || Nice, we received
>> links to 2 data sets yesterday, already, thanks to || Sarven:
>> http://270a.info || It is a good start and we are really hoping for
>> more. Note that most of || the links in
>> http://richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/imagemap.html only || point to
>> DBpedia and not outwards. || || In case you are not a Git expert,
>> GitHub allows you to upload links with || their GUI: || 1. create an
>> account || 2. fork this repo
>> https://github.com/dbpedia/dbpedia-links || 3. click on the "create a
>> file button" and upload your links || 4. send a "pull request" || ||
>> We might simplify the way to contribute later. Right now, Git seems
>> to || be the easiest way. Any ideas are welcome. || all the best, ||
>> Sebastian || || || || Am 16.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Sebastian
>> Hellmann: || > Dear all, || > || > we thought that it might be a nice
>> idea to simplify the workflow for || > creating outgoing links from
>> DBpedia to your data sets. This is why we || > created the following
>> GitHub repository: || > https://github.com/dbpedia/dbpedia-links ||
>> > || > Please feel free to add new files and change the links and
>> then send us || > a *pull request*.   This message is an announcement
>> as well as a request || > for comments. || > || > Here is a
>> (non-exhaustive) list of open issue: || > || > - it is yet unclear,
>> when the links will be loaded into || > http://dbpedia.org/sparql
>> (maybe with version 3.9? ) || > - we plan weekly updates to
>> http://live.dbpedia.org || > - yago, freebase and flickrwrappr have
>> been excluded due to their size ( || >   > 0.5GB ) || > - there will
>> be some quality control; not everybody will be able to || > include
>> any links he wants to include. We are open to ideas how to || >
>> manage this. Consider "pull requests" as "application for inclusion"
>> || > - folder/file structure is still very simple, we will adapt upon
>> uptake || > || > All the best, || > Sebastian || > || > || > || || ||
>> -- || Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann || Department of Computer
>> Science, University of Leipzig || Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org ,
>> http://dbpedia.org || Homepage:
>> http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann || Research
>> Group: http://aksw.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:45 UTC