- From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:03:59 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hello Jeni, On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:13:09AM +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote: > I agree we shouldn't blame publishers who conflate IRs and NIRs. That is not what happens at the moment. Therefore we need to change something. Do you think semantic web projects have been stopped because some purist involved did not see a way to bring httprange14 into agreement with the other intricacies of the project ? Those purists will still see the new options that the proposal offers as what they are: Suboptimal. Or do you think some purists have been actually blaming publishers ? What will stop them in the future to complain like this: Hey, your website consists solely of NIRs, I cannot talk about it! Please use 303. You are solving the problem by pretending that the IRs are not there then the publisher does not make the distinction between IR and NIR. Maybe we can optimize the wording of standards and best practise guides to something like "these are the optimal solutions. Many people also do it this way but this has the following drawbacks..." Regards, Michael Brunnbauer -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 10:04:24 UTC