Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

On 3/23/12 11:35 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2012, at 14:05, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
>> 2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho<melvincarvalho@gmail.com>:
>>> I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of
>>> the current architecture (both pre and post HR14).
>> The votes of confidence are interesting to me, as I have not been
>> hearing them previously. It does appear we have a divided community,
>> with some voices feeling that 303 will be the death of linked data,
>> and others saying hash and 303 are working well. Where the center of
>> gravity lies, I have no way of telling (and perhaps it's not important
>> as long as any disagreement, or even ignorance, remains). As Larry
>> Masinter said at the last TAG telcon, things do not seem to be
>> converging.
> I'm sure many people are just deeply bored of this discussion.
>
> It's probably important, but I'm beginning to suspect that there isn't actually a "right" answer.
>
> - Steve
>
Steve,

Methinks the right answer is: leave HttpRange-14 alone, in due course 
the WWW will sort this all out, naturally :-)


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen