Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

On 3/23/12 10:05 AM, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
> 2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho<melvincarvalho@gmail.com>:
>> I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of
>> the current architecture (both pre and post HR14).
> The votes of confidence are interesting to me, as I have not been
> hearing them previously. It does appear we have a divided community,
> with some voices feeling that 303 will be the death of linked data,
> and others saying hash and 303 are working well.

Maybe you should create a poll with the title: does indirection via 303 
redirection mark the death of Web scale Linked Data?


> Where the center of
> gravity lies, I have no way of telling (and perhaps it's not important
> as long as any disagreement, or even ignorance, remains). As Larry
> Masinter said at the last TAG telcon, things do not seem to be
> converging.
>
> My gratitude to everyone who is participating in this round of exploration!

303 isn't disrupting the growth of Linked Data, if it was, the LOD cloud 
wouldn't continue to grow, exponentially. :-)
>
> Jonathan
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen