W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2012

Re: How to model the content from a document?

From: Hans Cools <hcools@telenet.be>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:47:29 +0200
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <990FFF57-5BE4-4A2D-9E0F-96EC3ACB9F56@telenet.be>
To: Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com>
Hi Leyla,


Please have a look at following ontologies:

http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl
Declaring e.g.
informationRealization:InformationRealization

http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl
It depends on the abovementioned ontology.
Declaring e.g.
irw:InformationResource

http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/document#
It depends on the abovementioned ontologies.
Declaring e.g.
doc:Content	rdfs:subClassOf irw:InformationResource.

Cheers,
Hans


On 03 Jul 2012, at 11:24, Leyla Jael García Castro wrote:

> Hi all, 
> 
> I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO (http://purl.org/spar/doco) for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc.
> Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in it. Here an example:
> 
> <myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section
> 	; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph
> 		; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] .
> 
> What would be the best approach to do that? bibo:content (http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that one; the recommendation there is to use rdf:value, that would be an alternative. sioc:content is another alternative. It could also be c4o:hasContent (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also other alternatives out there.
> 
> Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks so much, 
> 
> lj
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:47:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:41 UTC