W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Ontology license info

From: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:50:11 +0200
Cc: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6204FC33-F0EE-4EA7-8B7C-652F8DFC3531@gmail.com>
To: Luigi Selmi <selmi_luigi@hotmail.com>
Yes, I know OMV. I was actually wondering what's the most used practice :-)

Val

On Jul 19, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Luigi Selmi wrote:

> The CC license RDFS vocabulary (at the end of the page).
> 
> Ciao
> 
> Luigi 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: vpresutti@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:23:23 +0200
> > CC: vpresutti@gmail.com
> > To: public-lod@w3.org
> > Subject: Ontology license info 
> > 
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > I could not find any suggestion of good practices for attaching a license to an ontology.
> > Of course one can report it on its documentation (for humans), but I was wondering if there is any diffuse practice for embedding this info in the ontology as a property value (for machine readability).
> > 
> > Any suggestion?
> > 
> > Thanks for the help
> > Val
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 12:50:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:34 UTC