W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:27:52 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimT9kXuPD+BD_C0w5jrBbMXV0-HjA=mVF8bBwA1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: nathan@webr3.org, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:

>  On 1/19/11 10:59 AM, Nathan wrote:
>
> htTp://lists.W3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jan/ - Personally I'd
> hope that any statements made using these URIs (asserted by man or machine)
> would remain valid regardless of the (incorrect?-)casing.
>
> Okay for Data Source Address Ref. (URL), no good for Entity (Data Item or
> Data Object) Name Ref., bar system specific handling via IFP property or
> owl:sameAs :-)
>

Kingsley, same for you as Nathan. To what specification do you refer to for
the definitions and behavior of:
 - "Data source address ref"
 - Entity
 - Statement.

-Alan


>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen	
> President & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 04:28:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:31 UTC