W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:01:14 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimqOh5p3pUzyDCmiF78Ew7m6RaJnSk=iJ0+ZkN9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Fellah <fellahst@gmail.com>
Cc: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
Hello Stephane

The question makes sense of course, although the initial focus of VOAF was
on ontology-like vocabularies.
Instances of both owl:Ontology and skos:ConceptScheme could be instances of
voaf:Vocabulary.
Actually we could define
voaf:OWLVocabulary as subclass of both owl:Ontology and voaf:Vocabulary
voaf:SKOSVocabulary as subclass of both skos:ConceptScheme and
voaf:Vocabulary
then restrict the domain of voaf:classNumber and voaf:propertyNumber to the
former, and add properties such as conceptNumber to the latter.
I put that on the backburner, but it's clearly one the many possible
extensions.

Bernard

2011/1/17 Stephane Fellah <fellahst@gmail.com>

> Bernard,
>
> Thanks for your answer. Another question I was wondering: Can we extend the
> VOAF ontology to describe SKOS taxonomies ? Does this question make sense to
> you ?  In the case of SKOS, we have only the notion of concepts not classes
> and properties.
>


-- 
Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Vocabulary & Data Engineering
Tel:       +33 (0) 971 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
----------------------------------------------------
Mondeca
3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    http://www.mondeca.com
Blog:    http://mondeca.wordpress.com
----------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 23:01:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:31 UTC