W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:27:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2EEF9E.8050809@webr3.org>
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 11:43 +0000, Nathan wrote:
>> "linked data" is not some term for data with links, it's an engineered 
>> protocol which has constraints and requirements to make the whole thing 
>> work.
> Where is the spec for this "engineered protocol" and where in that spec
> does it redefine rdfs:seeAlso?
> [I believe I have reasonably decent understanding of, and experience
> with, linked data. It is a useful set of conventions and practices
> building on some underlying formal specifications. However, I'm not
> aware of those practices being so universally agreed and formally
> codified as to justify some of the claims being made in this thread.]

Hence my comment:

"Perhaps this points to a need to standardize Linked Data as a protocol."


Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:29:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:11 UTC