W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2011

Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies

From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:43:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4D95F2B7.4050303@elbklang.net>
To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org, pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Hi Bernard,

(cc-ed )

On 4/1/2011 5:07 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> But at http://dbpedia.org/ontology/ itself I get
> @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/>    rdf:type    owl:Ontology ;
>      owl:versionInfo "Version 3.5"@en .
> Missing a triple such as
> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/>    rdfs:isDefinedBy    foo
> I've got at least a version number :)
> So where is the RDF file containing the whole ontology?

[1] references [2], which is a zipped file of the DBPedia Ontology.

However, you are absolutely right, re. Linked Data publishing principles 
it might beneficial if, e.g.,

curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://dbpedia.org/ontology/


curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

would resolve to a RDF/XML serialized description. It is a basic 
requirement especially re. Semantic Web ontology deployment to serve 
semantic graphs in different serializations formats. You are also right 
re. the application of rdfs:isDefinedBy for universals that are part of 
this ontology.



[1] http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Ontology
[2] http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.6/dbpedia_3.6.owl.bz2
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 15:44:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:13 UTC