- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:09:06 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
>> >> Is that an issue? Should we drop SKOS altogether if we go on with >> that, or should we use skos:exactMatch instead of owl:sameAs? > > see also http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/term_focus > > I'm running out of excuses for not having added this already... Great, thanks for the link! However, I'd like to understand why a sameAs would be bad here, I have the intuition it might be, but am really not sure. It looks to me like there's no resource out there that couldn't be a SKOS concept as well (you may want to use anything for categorisation purpose --- the loose "categorisation" relationship being encoded in the predicate, not the type). If it can't be, then I am beginning to feel slightly uncomfortable about SKOS :-) I am sure this problem must have been looked at before, e.g. within LCSH? Cheers, y
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:09:40 UTC