W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Conneg representation equivalence

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:04:55 +0000
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1268301895.27087.127.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:24 +0000, Nathan wrote:
> If I have multiple representations of a resource which I consider
> equal, let's say one of each of the following: RDF+XML, RDF+N3, SVG
> 
> Then should all three representations be considered equivalent?

They certainly *could* all represent the same thing. Whether they *do*
represent the same thing is a judgement call.

> Is it correct that all representations must have consistent fragment
> identifiers in order to be considered equivalent? 

A fragment identifier should not identify different things in different
representations. (Though it may be unrepresented in some or all of the
representations.)

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 10:05:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:25 UTC