W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Context Tags, Context Sets and Beyond Named Graphs...

From: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:50:31 +0100
Message-Id: <2BC06182-8317-4884-8ED0-43ABE1699344@rauschma.de>
Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
To: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
This description reminds me of NRL, maybe it is closer to what you need.
http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nrl/

Axel

On Jan 18, 2010, at 21:47 , Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Hi Jeni,
> 
> 2010/1/18 Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>:
>> Do you think that http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/ is sufficient for
>> describing the relationships between graphs (for these purposes) and if not,
>> what do you think needs adding?
> 
> No I don't think its sufficient, certainly not for the kinds of use
> cases that Paul was describing. The RDFG schema only has two
> properties defining equivalency and a sub-set relationship.
> 
> I was thinking more along the lines of a means to describe the process
> of constructing a graph by operations on a set of other graphs, where
> those operations would include basic algrebra operators.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> L.
> 
> -- 
> Leigh Dodds
> Programme Manager, Talis Platform
> Talis
> leigh.dodds@talis.com
> http://www.talis.com
> 
> 

-- 
Axel.Rauschmayer@ifi.lmu.de
http://www.pst.ifi.lmu.de/~rauschma/
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 23:22:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:24 UTC