W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > February 2010

Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:53:56 +0000
Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C3018F09-55CF-498D-BF22-516A6B89D0DE@cyganiak.de>
To: Jiří Procházka <ojirio@gmail.com>
Jiri,

On 22 Feb 2010, at 10:51, Jiří Procházka wrote:
> I wonder if we as a group of people
> interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
> mapping.

Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to be

- more stable
- more mature
- more likely to be widely used
- more likely to be around for a longer time

then you should map your terms to it. If not, don't.

So IMO the rdfg vocabulary should map to the SPARQL Service  
Description vocabulary as soon as it becomes REC, but SPARQL-SD should  
NOT map to rdfg.

Best,
Richard


>
> Best,
> Jiri
>
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> thanks,
>> .greg
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#id41794
>>
>
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 12:54:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:25 UTC