W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Project idea: cviki (or some better name than that)

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:35:22 -0400
Message-ID: <4A9E82AA.702@openlinksw.com>
To: ying ding <dingying@indiana.edu>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
ying ding wrote:
> Hi Toby,
>
> It is a great idea. But how can you handle the security issue as your 
> data are sensitive. Currently, I am not aware of the security 
> implementation for RDF and SPARQL. Glad to hear other's opinion on the 
> security problem of SW.

Ying,

We do have FOAF+SSL, and it does offer critical foundation for policy 
based data access that can be applied to SPARQL endpoints, specific 
Named Graphs, or specific Resource HTTP URIs. Basically, it is capable 
of enabling you to state that a resource, published to the Web via your 
Personal Data Space,  can only be *read* by your relatives | friends | 
employers  etc.. (via foaf:Groups for instance) .

Links:

1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/foaf+ssl
2. 
http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VirtAuthPolicyFOAFSSL


Kingsley
>
> thanks
> ying
>
> Toby Inkster wrote:
>> I think this is a great idea for a project, but I don't have time to 
>> do it myself...
>>
>> 1. Set up a wiki (pref MediaWiki) for people to publish their 
>> CVs/Resumés. This might need slightly different access restrictions 
>> than normal MediaWiki installations to prevent people from negatively 
>> editing others' CVs.
>>
>> 2. The site would provide a bunch of MediaWiki "templates" which 
>> would expose the CV data as XHTML+RDFa using the FOAF and DOAC vocabs 
>> primarily.
>>
>> 3. The site would provide a conformance checking tool for CV authors, 
>> using RDFS and OWL reasoning, and perhaps in-built knowledge of FOAF 
>> and DOAC, to look at individual CVs and check them for 
>> contradictions. (e.g. range/domain conflicts.)
>>
>> 4. The site would provide a "dictionary" of skills, each with a URI, 
>> for more standardised markup of a person's skillset.
>>
>> 5. A bot would monitor the "recent changes" RSS feed (is this valid 
>> RSS 1.0 - i.e. RDF? If not, it could maybe be fixed.) finding CVs 
>> which had recently been changed. Each of these would be parsed as 
>> RDFa and entered into a big, communal triple store (using the URL of 
>> the CV page as a graph name for easy maintenance).
>>
>> 6. A SPARQL endpoint would be exposed for the big triple store.
>>
>> 7. People could write various human-friendly forms as a wrapper for 
>> the SPARQL endpoint. The cviki community would vote on the best of 
>> these, and the winner would be placed on the Wiki front page.
>>
>
>


-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 14:36:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:23 UTC