- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:33:54 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 14:26 +0000, Nathan wrote: > Primary question in this scenario is why dc:subject through to local tag > then tag associated with moat:localMeaning rather than dc:subject > straight through to dbpedia resource? ... > > .. as from the dc docs I gathered that "This term (dc:subject) is > intended to be used with non-literal values as defined in the DCMI > Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of > December 2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this > intention with a formal range declaration." For me it wasn't an question of what to link to when using dc:subject; but rather which predicate to use when linking from a foaf:Document to a skos:Concept. dc:subject seemed the ideal solution. Can dc:subject be used to link straight from a document to a dbpedia resource? Maybe. The definition is sufficiently woolly. Personally if I were linking directly between them I'd use foaf:topic/foaf:page. > Also, noted that you opted for a different doc type "XHTML+RDFa > 1.0+Role" in demiblog (assumed you're the core dev) any specific notes > on why you're using a customised DTD rather than XHTML+RDFa or HTML5? I use the role attribute which is not defined by the XHTML+RDFa DTD. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/ -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:34:43 UTC