- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:35:11 +0100
- To: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org, taxacom@mailman.nhm.ku.edu
On 25 May 2009, at 14:37, joel sachs wrote: > 1. Have you considered putting the species name inside the URLs for > the pages? This would simplify human interaction with the data; > would there be a downside? While that seems like a useful idea, I wanted to use the same identifiers as IUCN do. e.g. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/136309 http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/populations/136309 This means you can just use their search engine. Also, I have some indices which may be of use: http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/indices/taxon/ > 2. I notice that the URI > http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/terms/categories#assessment > does not yet exist. Nothing under /2009/terms/ exists yet - I don't intend to put anything there until I've figured out IUCN's licensing policy for this data, as it would be a shame to do all that work and then find I have to take it down. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 25 May 2009 21:35:43 UTC