Dan Brickley wrote: > On 1/3/09 01:30, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > > The problem here imho is that too many people have forgotten that it > is the "Semantic Web project", and instead treat "Semantic Web" as the > name for a research field, or for a hypothetical future version of the > Web that may never exist. > > cheers, > > Dan > > Dan, Awesome re: "The problem here imho is that too many people have forgotten that it is the "Semantic Web project", and instead treat "Semantic Web" as the name for a research field, or for a hypothetical future version of the Web that may never exist." I think this is one of the most important points that we all need to remember :-) The "Project" part needs emphasis as it really clears up matters when talking outside the core SemWeb community. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.comReceived on Sunday, 1 March 2009 19:33:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:19 UTC