W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

From: Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:57:52 -0700
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
Cc: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>, public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <1245758272.2794.1776.camel@minmax-laptop>
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:37 +0100, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> Le 18/06/2009 16:46, Alexandre Passant a écrit :
> > I just reply to an e-mail from Toby on the topic on the commontag ml.
> > Since the archives are not yet public, let-me repost my point about the
> > mappings here.
> >
> > "A Tag in common tag is a tag a seen in Newman's ontology.
> 
> My understanding of Newman's ontology is that the URI tag:cheese (for 
> example) represent every occurence of the string "cheese" used as a tag.
> 
> This cannot work with common tag, since "cheese" can be used:
> - on resource R1 at date D1 as an AuthorTag
> - on resource R2 at date D2 as a ReaderTag
> 
> This practically forces us to define two distinct Tag resources, both 
> with the label "cheese", but with different types and taggingDate.
> 
> Of course, nothing prevents us from using the same resource, but in that 
> case, we would not know anymore which date and which tag type correspond 
> to which resource...
> 
> So the design of Common Tag implies that Tag resources should not be 
> "reused" across different tagging actions, which IMHO makes them quite 
> different from Newman's Tags (and close to Tagging, in fact).
 
Yes, exactly, that is the case.

>    pa
> 
-- 
Andraz Tori, CTO
Zemanta Ltd, New York, London, Ljubljana
www.zemanta.com
mail: andraz@zemanta.com
tel: +386 41 515 767
twitter: andraz, skype: minmax_test
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:03:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC