RE: Announcing Open GUID

I started a discussion on this topic
(http://groups.google.com/group/open-guid-discussion/browse_thread/thread/0bbc190aa80287d8)
to avoid polluting this list with the sordid details.  The goal is to
maximize linkage and minimize duplication and pollution with obtuse
inferencing concepts.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Announcing Open GUID
From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, September 25, 2008 1:15 pm
To: jason@openguid.net
Cc: public-lod@w3.org


jason@openguid.net wrote:
> Yes, I have not loaded DBPedia yet. I started with WordNet 3.0, which
> apparently did not deem IBM as a part of our language (note Mircosoft
> and Google do make the cut!). See the (http://openguid.net/roadmap) for
> more details on the data loading initiative. Once that is complete, if
> your favorite (least favorite?) company is still not loaded, anyone will
> be able to add it, tag it, and add identical references.
>
> And yes, the function was to find you an existing Open GUID based on
> some text. I will try to make that clearer.
>
> Thanks for the test drive,
> Jason
> 
Jason,

Yes, I see some data now [1].
How are you planning to proceed re. data from UMBEL, Yago, OpenCyc, and 
DBpedia?


Links:

1. 
http://demo.openlinksw.com/proxy/html/http://openguid.net/e6adf4e8-da25-102b-9a03-2db401e887ec


Kingsley