- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:44:08 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Kingsley, On 22 Nov 2008, at 17:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > LOD warehouses have a clear set of characteristics: > > 1. Static (due to periodic Extract and Load aspect of RDF production) > 2. Presumed to be less questionable by some re. license terms > > Dynamically generated Linked Data via wrappers also have their > characteristics: > > 1. Dynamic (RDF generated "on the fly") > 2. Presume to be questionable by some re. license terms > > Is the initial dichotomy I espoused still false in reality? Yes it is still false. There are plenty of LOD datasets that don't fit into your classification at all because they have on-the-fly generated RDF and have no IP or licensing issues whatsoever. Static vs. dynamic is about implementation techniques. Paying attention to licensing issues is a completely orthogonal issue. I really don't know where you get the idea that these two questions are the same. They are not. Cheers, Richard > > > I wonder :-) > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2008 19:44:47 UTC