- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:11:24 +1000
- To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: "Nicholas Humfrey" <Nicholas.Humfrey@bbc.co.uk>, public-lod@w3.org
2008/6/22 Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>: > On 21 Jun 2008, at 23:41, Peter Ansell wrote: >> >> <foaf:page>http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw.html</foaf:page> >> >> Note that in the above notation the page is an actual URL string and >> not an RDF resource which is intended because the person already has >> the semantic resource and just wants to get to the human readable >> version. > > Uh. > > Peter, the domain of foaf:page is foaf:Document. You can't put an > rdfs:Literal there. This is a rather weird suggestion. > > Richard Sorry about that. Is there any ontology term which can do that? Why are people so anti putting http URL's in as Literals? If it is an HTML page that relates to your current semantic "thing" then it seems reasonable to have it as a literal to me. Peter
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2008 02:12:00 UTC