W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Disjointedness of FRBR classes

From: Jakob Voss <Jakob.Voss@gbv.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:45:43 +0100
Message-Id: <4EAF33270200006F000243C8@mail.vz.gbv.de>
To: <public-lld@w3.org>
Karen Coyle  wrote:

>> That's splitting hairs. The only relevant representation of FRBR in  
>> RDF is http://vocab.org/frbr/ anyway. It was the first, it is  
>> documented best and any average developer will find this namespace,  
>> if looking for FRBR.
>
> The last time I brought this up, Ian Davis replied that his version of
 
> FRBR is not being maintained (there have been changes to the IFLA FRBR
 
> model since then). We should be sure that we are using an up-to-date  
> and maintained implementation of FRBR in RDF. Some could potentially  
> take on responsibility vocab.org/frbr, but I don't know that anyone
has.

It would be enough if Ian handed over edit rights for
http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/ 
to anyone who is willing to maintain an updated version. The current
version
is only hosted a http://vocab.org/. Just create a modified version and
put it at
some web server.

Jakob



-- 
Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG)
Digitale Bibliothek - Jakob Voß
Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1
37073 Goettingen - Germany
+49 (0)551 39-10242
http://www.gbv.de
jakob.voss@gbv.de
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 22:46:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 October 2011 22:46:10 GMT