W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Disjointedness of FRBR classes

From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:27:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4EA9949B.3010002@light.demon.co.uk>
To: public-lld@w3.org
Jumping in here without much knowledge, so be gentle ...

Does the FRBRoo manifestation, based on the CIDOC CRM, offer a less 
constrained model?  I see that an RDF instantiation from last April is 
available at:

http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/FRBR1.0.1.rdfs

Richard

On 27/10/2011 13:37, Tom Baker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:39:27PM -0400, Jon Phipps wrote:
>> This is basically how I view FRBR. And 'bundles of statements' doesn't
>> necessarily translate nicely into entities, classes, or even objects. Without
>> those, disjointness doesn't really seem to be much of an issue.
> Right - though they would translate nicely into "named graphs", with
> significant practical advantages (provenance, exchange, distributed
> maintenance...).
>
>> disjointness doesn't really seem to be much of an issue.
> To be clear - you mean that if the bundles of statements are not
> entities/classes/objects, it doesn't make sense to say they are disjoint,
> right?
>
> Tom
>

-- 
*Richard Light*
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 17:28:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 October 2011 17:28:25 GMT