Re: Comments on LLD XG Final Report : curation and preservation

Hi Bernard,

Thanks for the suggestion. I've recorded it in our reviews page [1] so that
the authors of the Executive Summary can take it into account.

Cheers,
Emma


[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportReviewerAssignments

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Bernard Vatant
<bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Pretty much impressed by the draft I just took the time to browse in
> details.
> The focus of this message is the final section
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion#Curate
> Seems to me, given the importance of this, it's too bad it come just at the
> end of the document. In particular the long-term preservation of
> Vocabularies and their URIs represents a new and critical type of digital
> preservation, in which libraries have to play a central role, if they don't
> want to see it taken by private initiatives of big corporations, à la
> schema.org.
> So far the issue has been poorly addressed, with the notable exception of
> DCMI, including the recent agreement for the long-time preservation of FOAF.
>
> I don't know what is the state of the Executive Summary, but how about
> having at least one sentence in it dedicated to this new role of libraries?
>
> Cheers
>
> Bernard
>
>
> --
> Bernard Vatant
> Senior Consultant
> Vocabulary & Data Integration
> Tel:       +33 (0) 971 488 459
> Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Mondeca
> 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
> Web:    http://www.mondeca.com
> Blog:    http://mondeca.wordpress.com
> ----------------------------------------------------
>