I would take intention (t) in the technical sense of being about [the entity being referred to by the bibliographer]. That also covers the use of names as subjects. In fact, if the association had been written about, there might be an authority entry for them. Most of the VIAF files have name entries for "Jesus Christ", despite his lack of publications (the entries lack birth and death dates too). Another good example is "Grant Naylor", who are the authors of Red Dwarf, who have a personal name record, and who also have individual personal name records. >From an ontological point of view, there are other kinds of things that we need to consider; organizations, which have an entity separate from the individuals who compose it vs. groups, whose identity is defined solely by their membership. I believe that foaf handles this already? I don't have FRSAD and FRAD in front of me; I don't think FRSAD makes a difference here though. Simon On Apr 13, 2011 6:27 AM, "gordon@gordondunsire.com" < gordon@gordondunsire.com> wrote:
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 10:59:55 UTC