Re: Role of public-xg-lld and public-lld mailing lists

From: "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>
To: "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>; "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 2:25 PM
Subject: Role of public-xg-lld and public-lld mailing lists

> In short, we stand by our position of using two lists with
> extensive cross-posting.

As I've said I support the two-list system (and perhaps I'm the only one 
other than the Chairs who has said so) but why the "extensive cross 
posting"?  Why not implement the plan (as I suggested) where administrative 
matters are confined to the XG list and all substantive content confined to 
the public list?

--Ray