W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > May 2013

RE: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 20:30:49 +0200
To: "'Peter Ansell'" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <017b01ce4ce3$55399f90$ffacdeb0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:41 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:

> I would be satisfied if the following passage in Section E,
> 
>     "The profile parameter may be used by clients to express their
>     preferences in the content negotiation process."
> 
> was modified to something like:
> 
>     "The profile parameter MAY be used by clients to express their
>     preferences in the content negotiation process. If the profile
>     parameter is given a server SHOULD return a document that is
>     structured based on the profiles in the list which are recognized
>     by the server."

Sounds reasonable. Does someone object including this statement?


> I also have one minor editorial change to another sentence in Section E:
> 
>     "When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is
>     important to note that its value is contains one or more URIs and
>     not IRIs."
> 
> should be:
> 
>     "When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is
>     important to note that its value contains one or more URIs and
>     not IRIs."

Fixed: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/ba0f6495fb735fa58ea08fa70bd2cd69e82427f7
Thanks for reporting it.



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 18:31:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:22 UTC