W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Updated Editor's Draft of JSON-LD Syntax

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:38:38 +0100
Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <72C11D1A-489D-41FE-8D81-93533267627E@w3.org>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Manu,

I know I sound like a broken record. But the 

{
  "@id" : [
     { ... }
     { ... }
   ]
}

idiom is still not defined anywhere and it just pops up from nowhere in section A.2. I do not believe that the syntax and semantics in that example can be derived from any of the previous sections.

Ivan

On Jan 22, 2012, at 22:25 , Manu Sporny wrote:

> I spent the day today thoroughly vetting and updating the JSON-LD Syntax
> specification to reflect the latest thinking by this community group on
> the JSON-LD markup language.
> 
> The following actions were taken as a result:
> 
> * Completely de-coupled the JSON-LD Syntax document from the JSON-LD
>  API and normalization documents.
> * Thorough check on all spelling, grammar and links.
> * Terminology changes
>  * Web Vocabulary -> vocabulary
>  * literal -> value
>  * datatype -> type
>  * plain literal -> string value
>  * typed literal -> typed value
>  * chaining -> embedding
> * More detailed explanation of some of the JSON-LD concepts.
> * Minor technical corrections to match teleconference/mailing list
>  discussions
> * Processed all 45 closed bugs and ensured that there were links to a
>  timestamped specification section demonstrating that the resolutions
>  were not only adopted by the group, but they resulted in a
>  specification change.
> 
> The latest time-stamped specification can be found here:
> 
> http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/
> 
> A diff-marked copy from the previous version can be found here:
> 
> http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/diff-20120112.html
> 
> This is the type of editorial review we go through before heading into
> Last Call at W3C... so, the document is in /very/ good shape.
> 
> The only glaring issues that remain are the ones surrounding @list:
> 
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/44
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/52
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/60
> 
> We're very, very close to feature freeze for the JSON-LD Syntax.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout
> http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 09:37:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:36 GMT