W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2012

RE: Timeline and priorities

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:37:14 +0800
To: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <013201ccd01a$b3fb26d0$1bf17470$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Hi Manu,

> The JSON-LD Syntax document is very close to completion, only a few
> more
> passes are necessary before we could move it quickly from FPWD to Last
> Call at W3C and then on to REC. So, perhaps a few days of editing
> spread
> over a month of editorial work if both Gregg and I are working on it.

I can help if needed!? 


> The JSON-LD API needs more work, specifically on the framing algorithm
> and the normalization algorithm. I would estimate about a week or two
> of
> editing spread over a two month period of this document between two
> editors.

I think we should decouple the progress of the syntax and the API a bit
more. I have to confess haven't yet had a deep look at framing and
normalization but since it's a brand new spec which implements a thing that
is quite different from existing approaches I wouldn't rush too much on
specifying the API. We don't even know yet how people end up using JSON-LD.
So especially framing (or other query mechanisms) might be something where
we might need to spend much more time on.



> The RDF Graph Normalization document is the document that needs the
> most work.

The question here is if we completely separate it from JSON-LD or not, see
also ISSUE-53.


> So, I think this is the rough timeline:
> 
> End of January 2012: Start RDF Graph Normalization Community Group
> End of February 2012: JSON-LD Syntax editing complete
>                        Start discussion of JSON-LD WG w/ W3C

Sounds good.


> End of March 2012: JSON-LD API editing complete
> End of May 2012: RDF Graph Normalization editing complete

I doubt we will meet those deadlines.


> End of May 2012: Start JSON-LD WG at W3C.

Why can't we do that immediately after the syntax spec is complete?



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 04:37:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:36 GMT