Re: JSON-LD Basic

>
> Glenn, Brian, Kingsley,
>
> Is this more along the lines of what you had in mind?
>
> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/basic/


Well, there's less of it, so in that sense it's more *like* what I had in
mind. But I actually wanted a simple specification, not a subset of a
complex specification. There's a big difference. You have to be willing to
actually throw some stuff out, not just move it under a different
subheading. I think this still reads like an RDF appendix, rather than a
JSON addendum.