W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Quick remarks on http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/ (as of 8/23)

From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:55:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CALgRrLmV15nGU2Sa++qF2POcwoWWQYsmObsZ=ecMgRtzbFUVdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Hi Manu,

> Fixed, I think. The previous listing had this:
Thanks, this fixed the first issue.

> Fixed. You are correct, it was a copy-paste error. I've elaborated quite a
> bit on the intro to CURIEs.
Excellent. Also fixed.

Now only one more worry remains: @vocab and @base get only quickly
introduced, but it is not entirely clear what differentiates them.
They are only mentioned vaguely during the algorithm processing steps
and as keywords. I believe at some point there was even discussion if
we need both of them at all, or if one is sufficient. Sorry to bring
this up again, but what was the resolution after this discussion?


Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 07:56:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:18 UTC