W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2011

RE: IANA Considerations

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:39:57 +0200
To: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00c601cc5e6d$1b3c61d0$51b52570$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Gregg Kellogg wrote: 
> Framed is definitely an issue, since passing a URI as a mime-type
> parameter would be a non-starter; probably not sufficient to set
> format=framed without some other out-of-band communication of the
> frame. Note that application/json+ld;format=framed is reasonable as a
> Content-Type.

Why would be passing a URI as a mime-type parameter be a non-starter?

> Also, I'd like to keep the straight application/ld+json for an un-
> specified serialization. My library tries to be intelligent about
> creating @context/@coerce entries and use of chaining along the lines
> of other serializers I've written. This may not be specified, but it
> should be allowed.

The parameter is optional, so that shouldn't be a problem.

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 12:40:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:18 UTC