Re: bug? - ldp:membershipResource rdfs:range rdf:Property .

Agreed, that seems like a bug to me :)

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

> I think you are correct Elf.
>
> Henry
>
> > On 6 Jan 2016, at 18:35, elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp# in text/html and text/turtle representations
> > state:
> >
> > "membershipResource range: rdfs:Property - Indicates the
> > membership-constant-URI in a membership triple. Depending upon the
> > membership triple pattern a container uses, as indicated by the presence
> > of ldp:hasMemberRelation or ldp:isMemberOfRelation, the
> > membership-constant-URI might occupy either the subject or object
> > position in membership triples."
> >
> >
> > ldp:membershipResource
> >       a rdf:Property;
> >       rdfs:comment "Indicates the membership-constant-URI in a membership
> > triple.  Depending upon the membership triple pattern a container uses,
> > as indicated by the presence of ldp:hasMemberRelation or
> > ldp:isMemberOfRelation, the membership-constant-URI might occupy either
> > the subject or object position in membership triples.";
> >       vs:term_status "stable";
> >       rdfs:domain :Container;
> >       rdfs:isDefinedBy :;
> >       rdfs:label "membershipResource";
> >       rdfs:range rdf:Property.
> >
> >
> > shouldn't it have
> >
> > ldp:membershipResource rdfs:range rdf:Resource .
> >
> > similar to ldp:member
> >
> > ldp:member rdfs:range rdfs:Resource .
> >
> >
> > while rdfs:range makes sense to me for ldp:hasMemberRelation and
> > ldp::isMemberOfRelation, it seems that ldp:membershipResource should
> > have rdfs:range rdfs:Resource
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305

Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 17:57:52 UTC