- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:42:09 +0000
- To: Elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: public-ldpnext@w3.org, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
I think you are correct Elf. Henry > On 6 Jan 2016, at 18:35, elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp# in text/html and text/turtle representations > state: > > "membershipResource range: rdfs:Property - Indicates the > membership-constant-URI in a membership triple. Depending upon the > membership triple pattern a container uses, as indicated by the presence > of ldp:hasMemberRelation or ldp:isMemberOfRelation, the > membership-constant-URI might occupy either the subject or object > position in membership triples." > > > ldp:membershipResource > a rdf:Property; > rdfs:comment "Indicates the membership-constant-URI in a membership > triple. Depending upon the membership triple pattern a container uses, > as indicated by the presence of ldp:hasMemberRelation or > ldp:isMemberOfRelation, the membership-constant-URI might occupy either > the subject or object position in membership triples."; > vs:term_status "stable"; > rdfs:domain :Container; > rdfs:isDefinedBy :; > rdfs:label "membershipResource"; > rdfs:range rdf:Property. > > > shouldn't it have > > ldp:membershipResource rdfs:range rdf:Resource . > > similar to ldp:member > > ldp:member rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . > > > while rdfs:range makes sense to me for ldp:hasMemberRelation and > ldp::isMemberOfRelation, it seems that ldp:membershipResource should > have rdfs:range rdfs:Resource > > Cheers! >
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 17:42:41 UTC