W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:44:34 -0700
Message-ID: <5150B732.7020103@berkeley.edu>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-ldp@w3.org
hello all.

On 2013-03-25 13:36 , Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> +1000
> -1000
> If Erik is okay, which I believe he is, then I genuinely believe we have
> a solution that addresses a broad profile of participants in this
> endeavor. We also address a fundamental problem that dogs RDF re. clarity.

just to make this crystal clear: i don't get to decide what the LDP WG 
is doing. and in the past it seemed to me that the WG is mostly leaning 
towards using generic RDF media types. it's not what i would do, and 
like any other WG member, i am expressing my design preferences and some 
justification for them. if the WG chooses to go a different way, that's 
perfectly ok.



erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 20:44:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:10 UTC