- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:07:13 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kingsley (Uyi) Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
On 24 Jan 2014, at 15:55, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > On 01/24/2014 09:15 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 1/24/14 3:11 AM, Henry Story wrote: >>>> Somewhere inhttp://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.html, at the fragment-id >>>> >#Container, I expect to find something saying that ldp:Container when >>>> >used with rel=profile denotes the Container interaction model as >>>> >defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id. >>> You can not do things like that in RDF. You can not have a URI >>> denote one thing if it is related to by one relation, and another thing >>> if it is related to by another relation. >>> >> Alexandre, >> >> Wouldn't you be better served by providing an example of what you mean? >> Like Henry, I don't understand what you mean i.e., how you would express >> what you claim using RDF. >> > > <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container> a rdf:Class ; > dc:description "when use with with rel=profile, denotes the Container interaction model as defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id" . This suggests that with another relation ldp:Container denotes something else. Yet a URI always only denotes one thing. That is core to the notion of a URI, and clearly written out in the ldp semantics. Henry > > Alexandre. Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 15:08:33 UTC