- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:55:06 -0500
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
On 01/24/2014 09:15 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/24/14 3:11 AM, Henry Story wrote: >>> Somewhere inhttp://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.html, at the fragment-id >>> >#Container, I expect to find something saying that ldp:Container when >>> >used with rel=profile denotes the Container interaction model as >>> >defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id. >> You can not do things like that in RDF. You can not have a URI >> denote one thing if it is related to by one relation, and another thing >> if it is related to by another relation. >> > Alexandre, > > Wouldn't you be better served by providing an example of what you mean? > Like Henry, I don't understand what you mean i.e., how you would express > what you claim using RDF. > <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container> a rdf:Class ; dc:description "when use with with rel=profile, denotes the Container interaction model as defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id" . Alexandre.
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 14:55:17 UTC