- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:34:24 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52D969A0.80103@openlinksw.com>
On 1/17/14 9:25 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> I am attracted to the word "member" rather than "contain". I think I >> would also prefer something like "Document" in the link between LDPC >> and LDPR (memberDocument ?). > > I kind of agree that now we have ldp:contains, the previous > ldp:membershipXXX relations lend to less confusion. This is not to say > that there may not be a better name yet than tge ldp:membershipXXX > relations. Can we not use <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> and <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment> relations to handle human oriented descriptions? Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 17:34:47 UTC