ISSUE-50 should be postponed

• From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
• Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:44:59 +0200
• To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <7A7F066C-C00A-4B2B-BC5B-51DAA8D094E9@bblfish.net>

I am pretty sure that ISSUE-50 was not voted to
be closed, but to be postponed during the face
to face. 

  Somehow it was considered difficult to implement,
where clearly it is easier than most other things
to implement that have gone through: it only requires
an entry in an ontology.

  In any case it was decided that this could be
introduced at a later stage. So I don't see why 
this is closed.

	Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 07:45:29 UTC